HiSET · Science · 6 min read
Evolution and Biological Investigations
- Analyze how fossil sequences, dating methods, and comparative anatomy provide evidence for evolutionary relationships.
- Identify and evaluate core components of controlled biological experiments, including variables, control groups, and sampling methods.
- Distinguish between observations, hypotheses, theories, and conclusions, and apply these concepts to epidemiological investigations.
Evidence of Evolution and the Fossil Record
Fossils are the preserved remains, imprints, or traces of ancient organisms that lived long ago. Scientists investigate Earth's history by studying where and how these fossils are positioned in rock layers. In an undisturbed sequence of sedimentary rock, older layers lie beneath younger layers. This fundamental pattern allows scientists to determine the sequence in which different organisms existed over geologic time.
To figure out when ancient organisms lived, researchers use two main approaches: relative dating and radiometric dating. Relative dating determines whether a fossil is older or younger than another based on rock layer position. In addition, index fossils, which are fossils of widespread species that lived for a relatively short geologic time, serve as useful reference markers to match and date rock layers across different locations. Radiometric dating uses the decay of radioactive isotopes to determine numerical ages for rocks and, in some cases, fossils themselves. When direct testing of a specimen is not possible, dating nearby rock layers can help estimate a fossil's age.
The fossil record also documents major evolutionary transitions. Transitional fossils display anatomical traits common to both ancestral and descendant groups, demonstrating how physical forms changed across generations. However, researchers do not find a complete, unbroken sequence for every organism. Gaps in the fossil record occur because fossilization is uncommon and many fossils have been destroyed or have not yet been found.
| Dating Method | Underlying Principle | Type of Age Result |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Dating | Evaluates rock layer position in undisturbed sedimentary rock sequences; older layers lie beneath younger layers; utilizes index fossils | Comparative age (identifies whether a fossil is older or younger than another) |
| Radiometric Dating | Measures the decay of radioactive isotopes in rocks or fossils, or dates nearby rock layers | Numerical age |
Common mistakes
- Believing that experimental data can prove a hypothesis with absolute certainty, when data can only support, contradict, or remain inconclusive regarding a hypothesis.
- Confusing a hypothesis with a conclusion, such as mistaking the preliminary prediction that nitrogen increases leaf growth for the post-experiment judgment that nitrogen increased leaf growth based on data.
- Assuming that a statistical correlation between an exposure and an illness proves that the exposure directly caused the illness.
- Thinking that homologous structures must perform the same function, when they actually share common ancestral origins even if they perform different functions today.
Key points
- Fossils and comparative anatomy provide evidence for evolution; in undisturbed sedimentary rock sequences, older layers lie beneath younger layers.
- Relative dating uses layer position and index fossils to establish relative age, whereas radiometric dating measures radioactive isotope decay to find numerical ages.
- Homologous structures share ancestral origins despite differing functions, vestigial structures lose ancestral function, and phylogenetic trees depict relationships inferred from fossils, anatomy, and DNA.
- Controlled investigations alter an independent variable, measure a dependent variable, keep constants unchanged, and use negative control groups as baselines.
- Pathogens spread through direct, indirect, vector-borne, or waterborne routes, and outbreaks are tracked using epidemiological curves, contact tracing, and quarantine during the incubation period.
- A valid hypothesis is testable and falsifiable, whereas a scientific theory is a broad explanation supported by extensive evidence.
- A correlation does not prove causation, and experimental data interpret whether a hypothesis is supported, contradicted, or unresolved without proving it with absolute certainty.
Practice this section
Explained HiSET Science questions, no account needed. HiSET Science practice test
The full lesson continues with 4 more sections with exam tips, audio in English and Spanish, 5 Check yourself questions and 20 flashcards.
- 1 month
$38.99$19.49 - 3 months
$113.99$56.99 - Lifetime
$233.99$116.99
One payment, no subscription.
See HiSET plansAlready a member? Log in
Sample lesson: Cells, Membranes, and Body Systems25 practice questions on this exam
Each HiSET practice test has 25 original questions with the answers explained. No account needed.
Open the HiSET practice testsOriginal lesson written for HiSET practice · updated October 18, 2026. Exam names are trademarks of their owners; tests.global is not affiliated with them.